To survive current pressures, hospitals must shift from passive investment to active value creation.
Academic Medical Centers (AMC) face unprecedented financial pressure. Operating margins have compressed to a median of 1.5%, while federal research funding continues to decline. In their recent New England Journal of Medicine Perspective article, Uppal and Song diagnose this challenge, and they propose venture capital as a solution.
It’s an attractive answer. With analysts forecasting 2026 as one of the best healthcare investing opportunities in decades, AMCs worldwide are adopting VC activities: Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi has integrated into Mubadala’s life sciences platform, for example, and Singapore’s SingHealth operates the HealthTech Innovation Fund.
But corporate VC funds run by AMCs typically generate average returns with limited impact. Simply writing checks is not enough. If AMCs want to thrive, they must see themselves as engines of creation—an interconnected concentration of investors, industry partners, mentors, and clinicians with AMCs as the nucleus—capable of shaping the future of healthcare.
This approach serves two vital functions. First, it creates “more shots on goal.” Because most early-stage companies fail, volume matters. So, an AMC generating hundreds of concepts increases the probability of commercializing innovations that drive financial returns and clinical improvements.
The most effective AMCs focus on rapidly creating new ventures, sometimes launching up to 20 annually. By incubating these companies from inception rather than making small investments in established companies, they can retain substantial equity stakes without the heavy financial burdens of later-stage investing.
Second, an AMC-centered ecosystem actively de-risks and accelerates the innovation cycle. Unlike standard VC firms, AMCs can clinically validate technology, access patient data, and rapidly pilot solutions on site. This dramatically increases startup success rates by empowering investments in companies that hospitals have already battle-tested.
The goal is to leverage AMCs unique abilities to foster a “virtuous cycle” of innovation, not a manage-portfolio approach. This involves two essential engines: organic innovation (where ideas come from internal staff) and open innovation (where partnerships are formed with external entrepreneurs). The technologies emerging from these ecosystems not only boost clinical efficiency but also lead to better patient outcomes.
One key example in the U.S. is Cedars-Sinai, who adopted this strategy via its Digital Innovation Platform and Accelerator. Acting as a “venture builder,” Cedars-Sinai collaborates with both external entrepreneurs and its own clinicians to identify pressing healthcare challenges. By being the initial funder, customer, and pilot site for new solutions, they ensure that these new companies are both clinically viable and operationally scalable before launching them into the broader healthcare market.
Another example is the ARC Innovation platform at our medical center. This initiative has integrated innovation within the organization and built a global network to enhance scalability. As highlighted in NEJM Catalyst, ARC has operationalized this by focusing on digital health, embedding innovation within the institution, and building a global ecosystem to ensure scalability.
We further partnered with global firm Deloitte to implement eight other major health systems around the world with this methodology. One example is Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin in Germany, where an ARC Innovation Center will open soon. Innovation is no longer treated as a side activity; venture creation is being embedded directly into Charité’s clinical and research infrastructure, using frontline insight to systematically build and scale new companies. This strategic shift is reinforced by strong public-sector backing, including support from the City of Berlin and the Einstein Foundation.
Since its inception, ARC has built an ecosystem of 125 startups, achieved six exits over four years, and, in 2024 alone, closed two exits totaling over $750 million, including Innovalve and Belkin, in addition to the success of the AI diagnostics unicorn, AIDOC. The value of these exits also extends beyond just serving as a hub for startups and investors; they are a catalyst for regional growth and job creation. For example, the ARC ecosystem has generated around 3,500 jobs and created approximately $6 billion in economic value, positioning it as a regional development leader.
While some critics may voice concerns about balancing traditional profit with nonprofit goals, viewing innovation as an interconnected ecosystem reconciles both. This model not only combines commercial success with clinical advancements but also empowers startups to thrive by addressing fundamental challenges in patient care.
The path forward is to build the future of healthcare, not just to invest in it. Transitioning from a VC mindset to an ecosystem approach allows AMCs to harness their clinical expertise and data, fulfilling their mission to advance human health with confidence and purpose.
The checkbook is one tool, but the ecosystem is the strategy.






