Failing to prioritize potential over experience when promoting and recruiting in healthcare could mean missing out on a crucial ingredient for growth and innovation. The industry’s hiring and career advancement paradigms have shifted, and simply filling open positions with experienced workers is no longer enough. Instead, medical organizations are adopting a more strategic approach, focusing on candidates’ future promises rather than solely on past experience. This shift is already gaining momentum with 37% of employers now prioritizing potential, a trend that is reshaping industries. Fortunately, those who comprise the healthcare workforce appear to be aligned with this movement.
According to a recent study, over 50% of healthcare professionals already express a strong interest in upskilling, driven by a desire for career progression. In fact, the ability to upskill ranks third among key job considerations for employees, following health insurance and benefits. This transformation in occupational development — where both employers and employees are focused on potential over historical achievements — means it’s time for many healthcare HR professionals and executives to revamp strategies. The decision to put learning and development (L&D) at the forefront of workforce planning is an excellent place to start.
Maximize the Role of L&D in Healthcare
L&D is no longer a back-office function; it is central to identifying when and how to train, when to hire, and how to execute skills-based hiring strategies. By aligning L&D with company goals, healthcare businesses can effectively address skill gaps and enhance workforce agility. An organizational strategy to get the ball rolling should consist of a thorough skills audit, strategically delivered training, and adopting an approach that offers personalized and unique learning opportunities.
Skills audits, in particular, are crucial as they identify competencies, inefficiencies, and other areas for improvement through data analysis, all of which are foundational to the success of any L&D program. Audits should examine customer satisfaction metrics, training data, and employee surveys to gather information that can inform targeted learning and upskilling initiatives. A firm understanding of where an organization’s workforce stands allows for more accurate tailoring of L&D efforts and hiring practices to meet specific needs.
Next, effective training delivery is critical, especially in healthcare, where time is scarce and the stakes are often high. L&D requires careful consideration of various factors, including onboarding requirements, regulatory guidelines, safety, technology, and even instructional formats. With a quarter of a million healthcare workers logging overtime and more than half feeling stressed and overworked enough that they’re ready to leave their jobs, innovative approaches are needed to fit development into professionals’ busy schedules. Strategies such as microlearning, just-in-time learning, and mobile accessibility help to ensure that training is seamless and easily integrated into daily workflows.
Shifting from pre-defined roles to skills-based assignments could also lighten workers’ loads, enabling them to tackle diverse tasks that better align their responsibilities with individual interests and strengths, eliminate knowledge silos, improve engagement, and enhance agility. This approach recognizes employees as well-rounded contributors with distinct abilities, enabling organizations to deploy talent more effectively. Teams typically appreciate this strategy, which fosters a sense of value among members who are recognized for their individuality.
Companies can actually take that personalization one step further and move training programs beyond the one-size-fits-all model. Customized and dynamic L&D embraces specialized training, coaching, and feedback to address specific needs and support continuous learning. This method promotes a culture of growth and advancement, which motivates employees and appeals to potential new hires.
Reskilling & Upskilling are Necessary to Keep Pace and Prevent Stagnation
Given technology’s rapid evolution and the global demand for workforce agility, it can be difficult to determine when to bring in new talent and when to invest in existing staff development. Even when recruitment is the chosen path, finding candidates with all the necessary proficiencies can be a challenge. Adopting a strong, well-targeted L&D program empowers leaders to strategically upskill current employees, equipping teams with future-ready capabilities to navigate disruption. Organizations can maintain agility by training internally for essential skills while hiring externally for others.
Reskilling and upskilling are critical to preventing employee stagnation, allowing healthcare workers to continuously hone their strengths, adapt to evolving industry demands, and pursue career growth within their organization. The benefits include:
- Increased job satisfaction: Continuous learning opportunities lead to higher morale and job satisfaction among team members.
- Higher retention: Employees are inclined to remain with companies that invest in their development.
- Competitive workforce: A skilled workforce is better equipped to handle challenges and seize new opportunities.
- Develop talent pipelines: Targeted training addresses skills shortages, prepares employees for future roles, and helps employers attract top talent.
By investing in L&D, healthcare organizations can build a workforce that is poised to meet today’s demands and adapt to tomorrow’s challenges. The new era of recruiting and career advancement in the industry demands a forward-thinking approach that fast-tracks potential and continuous learning opportunities. The sooner healthcare organizations adopt this mindset, the sooner they can enhance their agility and drive innovation.
Dr. Jill Stefaniak
Jill Stefaniak is the Chief Learning Officer at Litmos. Her interests focus on the professional development of L&D professionals and instructional design decision-making. She also serves as an Associate Professor in the Learning, Design, and Technology program at the University of Georgia. This content represents the opinions of Jill Stefaniak. It carries no endorsement of the University of Georgia.